<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Content Dethroned</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.seodiva.net/2008/01/30/content-dethroned/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.seodiva.net/2008/01/30/content-dethroned/</link>
	<description>SEO Consultant - Search Engine Optimization Advice and Tips</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 02:38:23 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/</generator>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Patricia Beck</title>
		<link>http://www.seodiva.net/2008/01/30/content-dethroned/#comment-676</link>
		<dc:creator>Patricia Beck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 17:19:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seodiva.net/2008/01/30/content-dethroned/#comment-676</guid>
		<description>I have to agree that content is a huge component but quality backlinks is also a major factor when it comes to page rank.  Can you recommend any paid directories that provide high quality backlinks?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to agree that content is a huge component but quality backlinks is also a major factor when it comes to page rank.  Can you recommend any paid directories that provide high quality backlinks?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SEO Diva</title>
		<link>http://www.seodiva.net/2008/01/30/content-dethroned/#comment-110</link>
		<dc:creator>SEO Diva</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2008 03:59:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seodiva.net/2008/01/30/content-dethroned/#comment-110</guid>
		<description>John, I like your analogy. Thanks for your comment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John, I like your analogy. Thanks for your comment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Hunter</title>
		<link>http://www.seodiva.net/2008/01/30/content-dethroned/#comment-109</link>
		<dc:creator>John Hunter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2008 02:03:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seodiva.net/2008/01/30/content-dethroned/#comment-109</guid>
		<description>If content isn't King it is pretty close.  But  King without the power of the kingdom isn't worth much.  Content only provides value as other see the great content and then pass on the compliments (either through links or other methods).  And you are right other sensible steps need to be taken to highlight good content.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If content isn&#8217;t King it is pretty close.  But  King without the power of the kingdom isn&#8217;t worth much.  Content only provides value as other see the great content and then pass on the compliments (either through links or other methods).  And you are right other sensible steps need to be taken to highlight good content.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SEO Diva</title>
		<link>http://www.seodiva.net/2008/01/30/content-dethroned/#comment-83</link>
		<dc:creator>SEO Diva</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 21:39:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seodiva.net/2008/01/30/content-dethroned/#comment-83</guid>
		<description>Robert, allinanchor has been a good indicator for a long time - if a site is not lined up through a keyword search with the allinanchor search, it means going through the backlinks with a fine-toothed comb to find the problem.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Robert, allinanchor has been a good indicator for a long time - if a site is not lined up through a keyword search with the allinanchor search, it means going through the backlinks with a fine-toothed comb to find the problem.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Neal</title>
		<link>http://www.seodiva.net/2008/01/30/content-dethroned/#comment-80</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Neal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 15:30:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seodiva.net/2008/01/30/content-dethroned/#comment-80</guid>
		<description>Interesting, I read &lt;a href="http://digitalgrit.typepad.com/getting_granular_the_digi/2007/12/the-google-of-o.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;this post&lt;/a&gt; on Getting Granular, which suggested Google's algorithm is not as complicated as everyone might think. Then when I read &lt;a href="http://www.onlinemarketingperformance.com/quick-google-ranking/" rel="nofollow"&gt;Scott's post recently&lt;/a&gt; it sounded like it definitely must not be the case that Google's algorithm is as simple as Getting Granular suggested. But you never know. I'm know search engine expert, but I've often thought Google probably does a lot of multivariate testing. So the results I see aren't necessarily the same as the ones they see.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting, I read <a href="http://digitalgrit.typepad.com/getting_granular_the_digi/2007/12/the-google-of-o.html"  onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview ('/outbound/digitalgrit.typepad.com');">this post</a> on Getting Granular, which suggested Google&#8217;s algorithm is not as complicated as everyone might think. Then when I read <a href="http://www.onlinemarketingperformance.com/quick-google-ranking/"  onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview ('/outbound/www.onlinemarketingperformance.com');">Scott&#8217;s post recently</a> it sounded like it definitely must not be the case that Google&#8217;s algorithm is as simple as Getting Granular suggested. But you never know. I&#8217;m know search engine expert, but I&#8217;ve often thought Google probably does a lot of multivariate testing. So the results I see aren&#8217;t necessarily the same as the ones they see.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
