<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Disappearing PageRank</title>
	<link>http://www.seodiva.net/2007/09/10/google-page-rank-disappearing/</link>
	<description>Get Awesome Search Engine Rankings for Your Web Site</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 03:35:10 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: SEO Diva</title>
		<link>http://www.seodiva.net/2007/09/10/google-page-rank-disappearing/#comment-500</link>
		<author>SEO Diva</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2008 22:01:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.seodiva.net/2007/09/10/google-page-rank-disappearing/#comment-500</guid>
		<description>@Joe - I find Google PR doesn't indicate longevity any more. In my research I've found many very old sites (in Internet time) that have not been optimized properly or that don't have many links to have a PR1. I still tend to think PR shows a certain Google trust level, although it's not the only thing to look at.

Referring to Oka's comment, PR0 sites can still rank and get traffic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Joe - I find Google PR doesn&#8217;t indicate longevity any more. In my research I&#8217;ve found many very old sites (in Internet time) that have not been optimized properly or that don&#8217;t have many links to have a PR1. I still tend to think PR shows a certain Google trust level, although it&#8217;s not the only thing to look at.</p>
<p>Referring to Oka&#8217;s comment, PR0 sites can still rank and get traffic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Money</title>
		<link>http://www.seodiva.net/2007/09/10/google-page-rank-disappearing/#comment-494</link>
		<author>Joe Money</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 05:05:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.seodiva.net/2007/09/10/google-page-rank-disappearing/#comment-494</guid>
		<description>Well it seems that Google will say anything to confuse us. The page rank is definitely not for are entertainment. 

I second what Shawn wrote. I would not use PR as a means to evaluate a sites ability to secure our information. I think PR does let us know how long they have been around. Which I guess you could say would be the test of a good business. The longer they have been around, must mean they are doing something right.

I think the only real benefit of a high PR is the good organic search rankings. I'm not sure however, how much weight is placed on PR in Google's algo. It sure helps though.

Great post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well it seems that Google will say anything to confuse us. The page rank is definitely not for are entertainment. </p>
<p>I second what Shawn wrote. I would not use PR as a means to evaluate a sites ability to secure our information. I think PR does let us know how long they have been around. Which I guess you could say would be the test of a good business. The longer they have been around, must mean they are doing something right.</p>
<p>I think the only real benefit of a high PR is the good organic search rankings. I&#8217;m not sure however, how much weight is placed on PR in Google&#8217;s algo. It sure helps though.</p>
<p>Great post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oka Mahendra</title>
		<link>http://www.seodiva.net/2007/09/10/google-page-rank-disappearing/#comment-247</link>
		<author>Oka Mahendra</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 05:56:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.seodiva.net/2007/09/10/google-page-rank-disappearing/#comment-247</guid>
		<description>I don't know exactly how page rank influences sites ranking is google. My new site has PR 0 but get some of traffic from google (about 300 hits / day) and rank well in important keywords.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know exactly how page rank influences sites ranking is google. My new site has PR 0 but get some of traffic from google (about 300 hits / day) and rank well in important keywords.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SEO Diva</title>
		<link>http://www.seodiva.net/2007/09/10/google-page-rank-disappearing/#comment-173</link>
		<author>SEO Diva</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2008 02:25:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.seodiva.net/2007/09/10/google-page-rank-disappearing/#comment-173</guid>
		<description>Valentino - I think PR is still valuable, regardless of what others say. Google doesn't tell us what our real PR is, but still, it's a measurement of some sort.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Valentino - I think PR is still valuable, regardless of what others say. Google doesn&#8217;t tell us what our real PR is, but still, it&#8217;s a measurement of some sort.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Valentino</title>
		<link>http://www.seodiva.net/2007/09/10/google-page-rank-disappearing/#comment-159</link>
		<author>Valentino</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Mar 2008 07:41:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.seodiva.net/2007/09/10/google-page-rank-disappearing/#comment-159</guid>
		<description>As per the recent PR update ... I think the big sites with PR of 5 and 6 are getting dropped ... like PR 6 directories getting PR 3 and PR 0 as well ....

so is PR to our still valuable in today's time ????  wat do u say</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As per the recent PR update &#8230; I think the big sites with PR of 5 and 6 are getting dropped &#8230; like PR 6 directories getting PR 3 and PR 0 as well &#8230;.</p>
<p>so is PR to our still valuable in today&#8217;s time ????  wat do u say</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SEO Diva</title>
		<link>http://www.seodiva.net/2007/09/10/google-page-rank-disappearing/#comment-11</link>
		<author>SEO Diva</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2007 03:51:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.seodiva.net/2007/09/10/google-page-rank-disappearing/#comment-11</guid>
		<description>You make a good point, Shawn. Thanks for your comment - I appreciate it! ~Kay</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You make a good point, Shawn. Thanks for your comment - I appreciate it! ~Kay</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shawn</title>
		<link>http://www.seodiva.net/2007/09/10/google-page-rank-disappearing/#comment-10</link>
		<author>Shawn</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2007 03:47:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.seodiva.net/2007/09/10/google-page-rank-disappearing/#comment-10</guid>
		<description>I have to be honest with you, Kay: if you're using the page rank as a measure of security with a site, you are going to be extremely disappointed down the road.  

Take our site for example - we have a page rank of 0.  We still use SSL, we still encrypt your credit card data at all times, and we never sell your information to 3rd parties without your consent. 

Conversely, I have had my personal credit card data stolen by a site with relatively high page rank (5) because one of the employees decided to make some extra money on the side.  

All I'm saying is, Google says it's for fun only, the data is frequently wrong, or at best outdated, and it is no indicator of the trust you can put in a website.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to be honest with you, Kay: if you&#8217;re using the page rank as a measure of security with a site, you are going to be extremely disappointed down the road.  </p>
<p>Take our site for example - we have a page rank of 0.  We still use SSL, we still encrypt your credit card data at all times, and we never sell your information to 3rd parties without your consent. </p>
<p>Conversely, I have had my personal credit card data stolen by a site with relatively high page rank (5) because one of the employees decided to make some extra money on the side.  </p>
<p>All I&#8217;m saying is, Google says it&#8217;s for fun only, the data is frequently wrong, or at best outdated, and it is no indicator of the trust you can put in a website.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott</title>
		<link>http://www.seodiva.net/2007/09/10/google-page-rank-disappearing/#comment-6</link>
		<author>Scott</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Sep 2007 19:24:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.seodiva.net/2007/09/10/google-page-rank-disappearing/#comment-6</guid>
		<description>Thanks for posting this Kay.  Page Rank has been highly suspect as of late.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for posting this Kay.  Page Rank has been highly suspect as of late.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
